Human Dimensions Specialization in
Natural Resource Sciences Graduate Program
Available to both MS and PhD candidates.
The Human Dimensions specialization seeks to improve the stewardship of ecosystems and natural resources by understanding and affecting people’s thought and behavior toward natural and managed environments.
Environmental managers and researchers increasingly need to understand the human element—human behaviors, attitudes and needs—and incorporate these into natural resources planning. They also may be called upon to facilitate collaboration between groups, help resolve conflicts, create policies, serve as educators, and advocate for environmental issues.
This specialization offers both natural resources and social science courses to provide a well-rounded curriculum focused on human-environment interactions.
Participating faculty in other units, such as Agricultural Economics, Anthropology and Geography, Psychology, Law, and Community and Regional Planning offer a range of natural resource and social science study, allowing students to design individualized programs.
Educational goals and objectives:
- Provide students a learning environment to promote an understanding of the human dimensions of natural resources, including emphases in environmental perceptions and behavior, planning, justice and law, evaluation, and economics.
- Formally recognize students who have attained an advanced knowledge of the human dimensions field as part of their graduate program.
- Support interactions and cooperation among the community of scientists and students working in the field of natural resources management.
Faculty Point-of-Contact
If you are interested in the Human Dimensions graduate specialization, please feel free to contact the following SNR faculty member:
Program of Study for the Master of Science in Natural Resource Sciences - Human Dimensions Specialization
Course Area2 | |
---|---|
HD Specialization Required Course NRES 829 Human Dimensions of Natural Resource Management | Required Courses and Credits1 |
1 course | |
Total Require HD Courses | 3 credits |
Quantitative/Qualitative Methods of Research & Analysis | Minimum Quantitative/Qualitative Methods of Research & Analysis |
Quantitative Data Analysis | 1 course |
Total Quantitative/Qualitative Methods of Research & Analysis | 3 credits |
Social Science Theoretical & Applied Perspectives | Minimum Social Science Theoretical & Applied Perspectives |
Anthropology | 3 courses |
Total Social Science Theoretical & Applied Perspectives | 9 credits |
Program Electives | Minimum Program Electives |
Socio-Ecological Systems | 3 courses |
Total Program Electives | 9 credits |
Total Methods, Social Science, and Program Electives | 24 credits |
Research & Thesis/Project credits | Minimum Thesis |
NRES 899 Masters Thesis | |
Total Thesis/Project credits | 6 credits |
Total Credits from coursework and research credits | 30 credits |
1Students must be sure to comply with UNL Graduate School requirements regarding the number of total credits and normal coursework required to be at or above level 900.
2Specific courses are not listed. Please work with your advisor and committee to identify specific courses to meet your requirements.
Program of Study for the Doctorate of Philosophy in Natural Resource Sciences - Human Dimensions Specialization
Course Area3 | |
---|---|
HD Specialization Required Course NRES 829 Human Dimensions of Natural Resource Management | Required Courses and Credits1 |
1 course | |
Total Require HD Courses | 3 credits |
Quantitative/Qualitative Methods of Research & Analysis | Minimum Quantitative/Qualitative Methods of Research & Analysis |
Quantitative Data Analysis | 3 courses |
Total Quantitative/Qualitative Methods of Research & Analysis | 9 credits |
Social Science Theoretical & Applied Perspectives | Minimum Social Science Theoretical & Applied Perspectives |
Anthropology | 4 courses |
Total Social Science Theoretical & Applied Perspectives | 12 credits |
Program Electives | Minimum Program Electives |
Socio-Ecological Systems | 4 courses |
Total Program Electives | 12 credits |
Total Methods, Social Science, and Program Electives | 36 credits |
Research & Dissertation Credits | Minimum Research & Dissertation |
NRES 999 Doctoral Dissertation | |
Total Research & Dissertation Credits | 24 credits |
Total Credits from coursework and research credits | 60 credits |
Credits from previously completed Masters Program2 | 30 credits |
Total Credits | 90 credits |
1Students must be sure to comply with UNL Graduate School requirements regarding the number of total credits and normal coursework required to be at or above level 900.
2Students are not required to have completed a Master’s degree prior to entering the PhD program. They are required to complete 90 hours of program credits to earn a PhD, either through additional coursework or research and dissertation credits with doctoral committee approval.
3Specific courses are not listed. Please work with your advisor and committee to identify specific courses to meet your requirements.
The importance of understanding human behavior in the conservation, management and restoration of natural resources, ecosystems and the environment has led to a greater emphasis on interdisciplinary and integrated research. For this reason, opportunities in business, government and non-governmental organizations have increased at all levels.
Selected Dissertations & Theses
Human Dimension of Woody Encroachment Management in Nebraska - Emily Rowen
- Thesis Defense
- 11/20/2023
Critical Factors and Individual Decision Making in Earthquake and Tsunami Preparedness Among Coastal Communities in Oregon U.S. - Shelley Olds
- Dissertation Defense
- 07/17/2023
Earthquakes and tsunamis are natural hazards that cause considerable loss of life, destruction of property and infrastructure, and economic damage. A key challenge for organizations that manage hazard preparedness and response is mobilizing earthquake preparedness among individuals and families, particularly in areas of significant earthquake and tsunami risk. This dissertation provides an examination of individual earthquake and tsunami preparedness from both a global and regional perspective. It comprises two publications that explore various aspects of disaster preparedness.
The first chapter presents a systemic literature review of 49 articles published between 2010-2020, identifying the prominent social-cognitive and demographic dimensions that promote or inhibit individual earthquake preparedness actions. The review highlighted critical motivating factors for individuals to take preparedness actions, including the significance of social connections, networks, and interactions; self-efficacy; personal responsibility and preparedness knowledge; and moderate worry or concern. Measures promoting self-efficacy, psychological skills, and social interaction show promise as effective strategies for enhancing individual earthquake preparedness and fostering community resilience.
The second chapter employs a grounded theory approach to develop a model that explains the process of building tsunami and earthquake preparedness among individuals residing in coastal communities of Oregon. While the motivations and obstacles reported by the study participants align with previous research, the findings highlight that the development of preparedness occurs incrementally, with individuals cycling between motivations and barriers as they undertake preparedness actions. The resultant theoretical model demonstrates the crucial role of social connections at every stage of the process. Several outcomes emerged from the model, including a culture of preparedness integrated into daily life, a state of readiness, and confidence in surviving earthquakes and tsunamis.
The objective of this dissertation is to contribute to the broader understanding of the interconnected factors involved in establishing preparedness and identify specific areas that warrant attention in future preparedness campaigns with similar dual earthquake and tsunami hazards.
The Role of Gender and Curiosity on Transformational Leadership: A Mixed Method Study - Brooke Mott
- Thesis Defense
- 04/12/2023
Environmental leaders are tasked with finding innovative solutions to dynamic and ever-changing environmental challenges. Leaders must possess the ability to gain and use new knowledge and experiences that motivate resolving gaps in one’s knowledge (i.e., curiosity) to find forward thinking solutions. Curiosity is an integral part of human existence but may be experienced in various ways. Studies have shown men and women may possess different leadership styles, but the influence of curiosity on leadership between genders has not been as readily explored. Women have shown unique characteristics for successful leadership in many contexts but are often underrepresented in natural resource management. Characteristics of curiosity and those of women leaders are similar to qualities in transformational leadership who are successful environmental stewards. This explanatory mixed methods study investigated the role of curiosity in transformational leadership and seeks to understand the influence of curiosity and leadership in women environmental leaders.
We assessed gender, trait curiosity, and transformational leadership scores of participants in the year-long Nebraska Water Leaders Academy. Regression analysis found that curiosity was a strong predictor of transformational leadership while gender was not, from both the participant and rater’s perspectives. Thematic analysis of interviews with women environmental leaders produced seven themes that inform the essence of how curiosity and transformational leadership influence the women’s experiences. Participants expressed constant awareness of stereotypical gender roles and how this played into power imbalances that both limited and supported elements of their curiosity and leadership. Their people-oriented curiosity supported communication, relationship building, and perspective gaining which were strengths of women leaders.
Nebraska Water Leaders Academy
Images courtesy of Mark Burbach