Human Dimensions Specialization in
Natural Resource Sciences Graduate Program

Available to both MS and PhD candidates.

The Human Dimensions specialization seeks to improve the stewardship of ecosystems and natural resources by understanding and affecting people’s thought and behavior toward natural and managed environments.

Environmental managers and researchers increasingly need to understand the human element—human behaviors, attitudes and needs—and incorporate these into natural resources planning. They also may be called upon to facilitate collaboration between groups, help resolve conflicts, create policies, serve as educators, and advocate for environmental issues.

This specialization offers both natural resources and social science courses to provide a well-rounded curriculum focused on human-environment interactions.

Participating faculty in other units, such as Agricultural Economics, Anthropology and Geography, Psychology, Law, and Community and Regional Planning offer a range of natural resource and social science study, allowing students to design individualized programs.

Educational goals and objectives:

  1. Provide students a learning environment to promote an understanding of the human dimensions of natural resources, including emphases in environmental perceptions and behavior, planning, justice and law, evaluation, and economics.
  2. Formally recognize students who have attained an advanced knowledge of the human dimensions field as part of their graduate program.
  3. Support interactions and cooperation among the community of scientists and students working in the field of natural resources management.

Faculty Point-of-Contact

If you are interested in the Human Dimensions graduate specialization, please feel free to contact the following SNR faculty member:

Dr. Mark Burbach

Program of Study for the Master of Science in Natural Resource Sciences - Human Dimensions Specialization

Course Area2

HD Specialization Required Course

NRES 829 Human Dimensions of Natural Resource Management

Required Courses and Credits1
1 course
Total Require HD Courses 3 credits
Quantitative/Qualitative Methods of Research & Analysis Minimum Quantitative/Qualitative Methods of Research & Analysis

Quantitative Data Analysis
Qualitative Research Methods
Geographic Information Systems
Psychometric Measurement
Sampling Techniques
Econometrics
Program Evaluation
Others with advisory committee approval

1 course
Total Quantitative/Qualitative Methods of Research & Analysis3 credits
Social Science Theoretical & Applied PerspectivesMinimum Social Science Theoretical & Applied Perspectives

Anthropology
Communication
Economics
Human Geography
Management/Leadership
Political Science
Sociology
Psychology
Others with advisory committee approval

3 courses
Total Social Science Theoretical & Applied Perspectives9 credits
Program ElectivesMinimum Program Electives

Socio-Ecological Systems
Additional courses from Methods and Social Science Perspectives
Additional credits with advisory committee approval

3 courses
Total Program Electives9 credits
Total Methods, Social Science, and Program Electives24 credits
Research & Thesis/Project creditsMinimum Thesis

NRES 899 Masters Thesis

Total Thesis/Project credits6 credits
Total Credits from coursework and research credits30 credits

1Students must be sure to comply with UNL Graduate School requirements regarding the number of total credits and normal coursework required to be at or above level 900.

2Specific courses are not listed. Please work with your advisor and committee to identify specific courses to meet your requirements.

Program of Study for the Doctorate of Philosophy in Natural Resource Sciences - Human Dimensions Specialization

Course Area3

HD Specialization Required Course

NRES 829 Human Dimensions of Natural Resource Management

Required Courses and Credits1
1 course
Total Require HD Courses 3 credits
Quantitative/Qualitative Methods of Research & Analysis Minimum Quantitative/Qualitative Methods of Research & Analysis

Quantitative Data Analysis
Qualitative Research Methods
Geographic Information Systems
Psychometric Measurement
Sampling Techniques
Econometrics
Program Evaluation
Others with advisory committee approval

3 courses
Total Quantitative/Qualitative Methods of Research & Analysis9 credits
Social Science Theoretical & Applied PerspectivesMinimum Social Science Theoretical & Applied Perspectives

Anthropology
Communication
Economics
Human Geography
Management/Leadership
Political Science
Sociology
Psychology
Others with advisory committee approval

4 courses
Total Social Science Theoretical & Applied Perspectives12 credits
Program ElectivesMinimum Program Electives

Socio-Ecological Systems
Additional courses from Methods and Social Science Perspectives
Additional credits with advisory committee approval

4 courses
Total Program Electives12 credits
Total Methods, Social Science, and Program Electives36 credits
Research & Dissertation CreditsMinimum Research & Dissertation

NRES 999 Doctoral Dissertation
NRES 996 Research Other Than Thesis (Independent Study)

Total Research & Dissertation Credits24 credits
Total Credits from coursework and research credits60 credits
Credits from previously completed Masters Program230 credits
Total Credits90 credits

1Students must be sure to comply with UNL Graduate School requirements regarding the number of total credits and normal coursework required to be at or above level 900.

2Students are not required to have completed a Master’s degree prior to entering the PhD program. They are required to complete 90 hours of program credits to earn a PhD, either through additional coursework or research and dissertation credits with doctoral committee approval.

3Specific courses are not listed. Please work with your advisor and committee to identify specific courses to meet your requirements.

The importance of understanding human behavior in the conservation, management and restoration of natural resources, ecosystems and the environment has led to a greater emphasis on interdisciplinary and integrated research. For this reason, opportunities in business, government and non-governmental organizations have increased at all levels.

student with plants

Selected Dissertations & Theses

A Better Great Plain: Bridging the Implementation Gap for a Better Future - David Sandahl
  • Thesis Defense
  • 10/23/2025
The Northern Great Plains is experiencing extensive native grassland loss and landscape degradation, jeopardizing both ecological integrity and the socio-economic systems that rely upon these ecosystems. Regenerative agriculture, specifically regenerative ranching, has emerged as a promising paradigm for advancing soil health, enhancing forage productivity, and fostering socio-ecological resilience. Drawing upon qualitative thematic analysis of self-identified regenerative ranchers, this study develops a synthesized definition of regenerative ranching that integrates rotational grazing, strategic land rest, cover cropping, forage diversification, and the minimization of tillage and synthetic inputs. Yet, the adoption of these practices is situated within a historically fraught socio-political context characterized by deep-seated mistrust between ranchers, federal agencies, and scientific authorities. Guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior, this research elucidates three principal barriers to participation in government programs such as the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP): negative attitudes toward program rigidity, identity-based tensions with conventional management paradigms, and low perceived behavioral control due to regulatory complexity and federal oversight. Furthermore, this study represents a novel application of the Reserves-as-Catalysts framework to the Northern Great Plains, revealing that proximity to natural areas correlates with more favorable orientations toward wildlife and conservation initiatives. These findings advance the scholarly understanding of how social-psychological factors mediate conservation program participation and underscore the necessity for federal agencies to align policy instruments with regenerative principles, expand financial and regulatory flexibility, and engage ranchers as co-producers of conservation outcomes. Collectively, this work contributes to theory and practice by demonstrating that trust-building and context-sensitive engagement are critical to scaling regenerative practices and achieving meaningful grassland conservation at landscape scales.

Nebraska Water Leaders Academy

Images courtesy of Mark Burbach