Human Dimensions Specialization in
Natural Resource Sciences Graduate Program
Available to both MS and PhD candidates.
The Human Dimensions specialization seeks to improve the stewardship of ecosystems and natural resources by understanding and affecting people’s thought and behavior toward natural and managed environments.
Environmental managers and researchers increasingly need to understand the human element—human behaviors, attitudes and needs—and incorporate these into natural resources planning. They also may be called upon to facilitate collaboration between groups, help resolve conflicts, create policies, serve as educators, and advocate for environmental issues.
This specialization offers both natural resources and social science courses to provide a well-rounded curriculum focused on human-environment interactions.
Participating faculty in other units, such as Agricultural Economics, Anthropology and Geography, Psychology, Law, and Community and Regional Planning offer a range of natural resource and social science study, allowing students to design individualized programs.
Educational goals and objectives:
- Provide students a learning environment to promote an understanding of the human dimensions of natural resources, including emphases in environmental perceptions and behavior, planning, justice and law, evaluation, and economics.
- Formally recognize students who have attained an advanced knowledge of the human dimensions field as part of their graduate program.
- Support interactions and cooperation among the community of scientists and students working in the field of natural resources management.
Faculty Point-of-Contact
If you are interested in the Human Dimensions graduate specialization, please feel free to contact the following SNR faculty member:
Program of Study for the Master of Science in Natural Resource Sciences - Human Dimensions Specialization
Course Area2 | |
---|---|
HD Specialization Required Course NRES 829 Human Dimensions of Natural Resource Management | Required Courses and Credits1 |
1 course | |
Total Require HD Courses | 3 credits |
Quantitative/Qualitative Methods of Research & Analysis | Minimum Quantitative/Qualitative Methods of Research & Analysis |
Quantitative Data Analysis | 1 course |
Total Quantitative/Qualitative Methods of Research & Analysis | 3 credits |
Social Science Theoretical & Applied Perspectives | Minimum Social Science Theoretical & Applied Perspectives |
Anthropology | 3 courses |
Total Social Science Theoretical & Applied Perspectives | 9 credits |
Program Electives | Minimum Program Electives |
Socio-Ecological Systems | 3 courses |
Total Program Electives | 9 credits |
Total Methods, Social Science, and Program Electives | 24 credits |
Research & Thesis/Project credits | Minimum Thesis |
NRES 899 Masters Thesis | |
Total Thesis/Project credits | 6 credits |
Total Credits from coursework and research credits | 30 credits |
1Students must be sure to comply with UNL Graduate School requirements regarding the number of total credits and normal coursework required to be at or above level 900.
2Specific courses are not listed. Please work with your advisor and committee to identify specific courses to meet your requirements.
Program of Study for the Doctorate of Philosophy in Natural Resource Sciences - Human Dimensions Specialization
Course Area3 | |
---|---|
HD Specialization Required Course NRES 829 Human Dimensions of Natural Resource Management | Required Courses and Credits1 |
1 course | |
Total Require HD Courses | 3 credits |
Quantitative/Qualitative Methods of Research & Analysis | Minimum Quantitative/Qualitative Methods of Research & Analysis |
Quantitative Data Analysis | 3 courses |
Total Quantitative/Qualitative Methods of Research & Analysis | 9 credits |
Social Science Theoretical & Applied Perspectives | Minimum Social Science Theoretical & Applied Perspectives |
Anthropology | 4 courses |
Total Social Science Theoretical & Applied Perspectives | 12 credits |
Program Electives | Minimum Program Electives |
Socio-Ecological Systems | 4 courses |
Total Program Electives | 12 credits |
Total Methods, Social Science, and Program Electives | 36 credits |
Research & Dissertation Credits | Minimum Research & Dissertation |
NRES 999 Doctoral Dissertation | |
Total Research & Dissertation Credits | 24 credits |
Total Credits from coursework and research credits | 60 credits |
Credits from previously completed Masters Program2 | 30 credits |
Total Credits | 90 credits |
1Students must be sure to comply with UNL Graduate School requirements regarding the number of total credits and normal coursework required to be at or above level 900.
2Students are not required to have completed a Master’s degree prior to entering the PhD program. They are required to complete 90 hours of program credits to earn a PhD, either through additional coursework or research and dissertation credits with doctoral committee approval.
3Specific courses are not listed. Please work with your advisor and committee to identify specific courses to meet your requirements.
The importance of understanding human behavior in the conservation, management and restoration of natural resources, ecosystems and the environment has led to a greater emphasis on interdisciplinary and integrated research. For this reason, opportunities in business, government and non-governmental organizations have increased at all levels.
Selected Dissertations & Theses
Human Dimension of Woody Encroachment Management in Nebraska - Emily Rowen
- Thesis Defense
- 11/20/2023
Critical Factors and Individual Decision Making in Earthquake and Tsunami Preparedness Among Coastal Communities in Oregon U.S. - Shelley Olds
- Dissertation Defense
- 07/17/2023
Earthquakes and tsunamis are natural hazards that cause considerable loss of life, destruction of property and infrastructure, and economic damage. A key challenge for organizations that manage hazard preparedness and response is mobilizing earthquake preparedness among individuals and families, particularly in areas of significant earthquake and tsunami risk. This dissertation provides an examination of individual earthquake and tsunami preparedness from both a global and regional perspective. It comprises two publications that explore various aspects of disaster preparedness.
The first chapter presents a systemic literature review of 49 articles published between 2010-2020, identifying the prominent social-cognitive and demographic dimensions that promote or inhibit individual earthquake preparedness actions. The review highlighted critical motivating factors for individuals to take preparedness actions, including the significance of social connections, networks, and interactions; self-efficacy; personal responsibility and preparedness knowledge; and moderate worry or concern. Measures promoting self-efficacy, psychological skills, and social interaction show promise as effective strategies for enhancing individual earthquake preparedness and fostering community resilience.
The second chapter employs a grounded theory approach to develop a model that explains the process of building tsunami and earthquake preparedness among individuals residing in coastal communities of Oregon. While the motivations and obstacles reported by the study participants align with previous research, the findings highlight that the development of preparedness occurs incrementally, with individuals cycling between motivations and barriers as they undertake preparedness actions. The resultant theoretical model demonstrates the crucial role of social connections at every stage of the process. Several outcomes emerged from the model, including a culture of preparedness integrated into daily life, a state of readiness, and confidence in surviving earthquakes and tsunamis.
The objective of this dissertation is to contribute to the broader understanding of the interconnected factors involved in establishing preparedness and identify specific areas that warrant attention in future preparedness campaigns with similar dual earthquake and tsunami hazards.
The Role of Gender and Curiosity on Transformational Leadership: A Mixed Method Study - Brooke Mott
- Thesis Defense
- 04/12/2023
Environmental leaders are tasked with finding innovative solutions to dynamic and ever-changing environmental challenges. Leaders must possess the ability to gain and use new knowledge and experiences that motivate resolving gaps in one’s knowledge (i.e., curiosity) to find forward thinking solutions. Curiosity is an integral part of human existence but may be experienced in various ways. Studies have shown men and women may possess different leadership styles, but the influence of curiosity on leadership between genders has not been as readily explored. Women have shown unique characteristics for successful leadership in many contexts but are often underrepresented in natural resource management. Characteristics of curiosity and those of women leaders are similar to qualities in transformational leadership who are successful environmental stewards. This explanatory mixed methods study investigated the role of curiosity in transformational leadership and seeks to understand the influence of curiosity and leadership in women environmental leaders.
We assessed gender, trait curiosity, and transformational leadership scores of participants in the year-long Nebraska Water Leaders Academy. Regression analysis found that curiosity was a strong predictor of transformational leadership while gender was not, from both the participant and rater’s perspectives. Thematic analysis of interviews with women environmental leaders produced seven themes that inform the essence of how curiosity and transformational leadership influence the women’s experiences. Participants expressed constant awareness of stereotypical gender roles and how this played into power imbalances that both limited and supported elements of their curiosity and leadership. Their people-oriented curiosity supported communication, relationship building, and perspective gaining which were strengths of women leaders.
Outdoor Play in Preschool Children: Parent attitudes and loose part play in urban setting - Ann Spilker
- Thesis Defense
- 04/27/2022
Exploring Social Dimensions of Ecological Restoration in the Removal of Two Dams on the Elwha River - Joe Hinnant
- Thesis Defense
- 04/05/2022
The United States is approaching a critical juncture regarding aging dam infrastructure. Recently, a common path forward has been to decommission and remove dams, returning rivers to a free-flowing state.
The primary focus of most literature on ecological restoration, especially dam removal, has been the ecological impact of the restoration. Attention from practitioners and researchers is shifting toward the importance of participation and the social dimensions of ecological restoration. The social situation surrounding a dam removal can lead to expedited success, delayed progress, or an abandoned removal effort. This study seeks to connect selected social dimensions of dam removal with the broader literature of ecological restoration by exploring the question, “how are social dimensions of ecological restoration expressed within public participation in a dam removal process?”
A qualitative research design using a directed content analysis was used to study selected social dimensions of dam removal contained in public comment letters sent to the federal agency in charge of removing two dams on the Elwha River of Washington. A codebook was developed to explore the social dimensions of restoration attitude, environmental attitude, place attachment, connectedness to nature, sense of community, and economics.
The findings of this study revealed those with positive restoration attitude more frequently referenced the social dimensions of environmental attitude, place attachment, connectedness to nature, and sense of community. While participants with negative restoration attitude centered more of their testimonies around the economic situation surrounding dam removals. Additionally, participants with a positive restoration attitude framed their comments and references to other social dimensions around the potential ecological, economic, and social gains following dam removal, while participants with a negative restoration attitude framed their comments around the possible ecological, economic, and social losses that would ensue following dam removal.
Findings from this study emphasize the importance of public participation in the dam removal process as well as the continued exploration of the social dimensions of dam removal. As this river restoration method becomes more commonplace, environmental managers will need to be able to effectively engage with the public and understand not only the ecological dimensions, but also the social dimensions of dam removal.
Bridging Boundaries in Stakeholder Engagement - Jodi Delozier
- Dissertation Defense
- 03/28/2022
Natural resource professionals, political leaders, and environmental organizations recognize the need for more informed and educated stakeholders to tackle today’s complex natural resource challenges. This dissertation investigates the nature of stakeholder engagement and its influence on natural resource management. The purpose of this study is to: 1) examine the attitudes that influence agricultural producers’ involvement in stakeholder engagement and community capacity building, 2) determine if boundary spanning skills can be developed through a professional development program, and 3) investigate the role of boundary spanners within a stakeholder-directed engagement process. Data was collected from interviews of Nebraska agricultural producers and natural resource professionals with experience in stakeholder engagement and from a survey of Nebraska Water Leaders Academy participants and their raters.
The first study explores the factors that enable or constrain agricultural producers’ engagement and community capacity building in Nebraska. A survey of agricultural producers was conducted identifying several barriers to producer participation. The findings also included enabling factors which may act as an incentive for more engagement by producers. The second study develops and evaluates an evidence-based boundary spanner development program for natural resource professionals. Nebraska Water Leaders Academy participants were asked to take part in a boundary spanner workshop as part of the year-long Academy and surveyed to assess their boundary spanning skills. The third study investigates boundary spanning skills evident among participants in an eighteen-month stakeholder engagement process in Nebraska. Twenty-five participant interviews were conducted covering a range of issues to determine if individuals participating in the stakeholder-directed engagement process exhibited boundary spanning skills and if so, how these skills were applied in practice.
These three research projects identify strategies that can lead to more effective and sustainable stakeholder engagement processes and highlight the challenges inherent in bringing a diverse group of individuals together to solve complex natural resource concerns.
Nebraska Water Leaders Academy
Images courtesy of Mark Burbach